Professional services firms seeking to improve project profitability often have a myopic focus on revenue generation and resource utilization with the hopes that these tactics are sufficient to optimize their KPIs. While revenue growth and healthy utilization are essential, forgetting to manage your profit margins can have a dramatic impact on the business’s long-term performance. The most successful professional services firms know this all too well.
Our recent infographic broke down the extreme impact profitability can have on a professional services firm. We used the lens of what it takes to earn $10 million in profit and how the strategies and tools a firm uses to measure profitability can significantly influence growth. This article will take a closer look at several of the common myths that still surround measuring professional services profitability.
Calculating professional services profitability is a mix of art and science. If any of these statements sound familiar, it may be time to take a look at how you are currently measuring profitability and organizing your work.
“Profitability is part of our hourly bill rates, so there is no point in measuring it”
While hourly bill rates should be set at a level that ensures profitability, they do not guarantee it. Using bill rates as a profit target ignores the other factors that go into delivering a project. Rework, schedule slippage, overtime, and scope issues all have an influence on profitability.
Recommendation: Bottom-up Revenue Forecasting
The most successful professional services firms will build a bottom up revenue forecast for each one of their projects. These forecasts will contain details about the type of resources needed, their bill rates, and their labor costs. This resource mix will provide a planned profit target for the project.
During the delivery process managers can keep tabs on the resource mix and its contribution to project profitability. If the project drops below its profit target, they can take actions like using more experienced team members to avoid “write-downs.”
“This project is fixed price, so we don’t need to track time against it”
This sentence is actually saying: “this is a fixed price project, so let’s see how much money we can lose.” The failure to track effort against projects, regardless of the professional services contract structure being used, is one of the biggest mistakes firms make. Making accurate estimates is hard, and if an estimate is off by just a little it will erode profit margins. Service leaders will have no idea if profit margins begin to slip if proper time tracking isn’t implemented throughout the project.
Recommendation: Comprehensive Time Tracking
Track every hour, against every project, always. Successful firms know this, and they drive a constant drumbeat of time compliance. Time tracking accuracy pays dividends, resulting in greater visibility into utilization and profitability, faster process improvement based on actual effort, and quicker invoicing. Add these factors together and your professional services firm has a wealth of information for identifying problem areas, creating better estimates, and getting paid faster.
“We won’t really know the profitability of this project until it’s done”
This myopic view is similar to the one above, and often associated with fixed price contracts. The rationale is that calculating profitability on fixed price projects can get a bit complicated = the revenue amount is fixed but the cost is highly variable. However, abandoning profitability measurement due to the complexity will create problems for your professional services firm. Understanding how to measure profit margins during a project will influence how that project is managed, resulting in better performance.
In fact, most modern professional services automation solutions (often abbreviated as PSA, these are the core operational system for professional services firms) take care of the heavy lifting. These tools are able to calculate mid-project profitability on fixed price work out of the box. SPI Research’s recent Professional Services Maturity Benchmark Survey highlighted just how much influence PSA software can have on project margins. Compared to businesses that did not run their professional services firm on a PSA solution, those who did saw nearly 25% stronger project margins! That translates into some serious bottom line growth.
Recommendation: Consider PSA as “Project Profitability Software”
Successful professional services firms leverage purpose-built tools that do a good job modeling their business and organizing their work. These systems manage revenue on fixed price work based on effort to date and effort needed to complete the project. This revenue recognition approach unlocks mid-project profitability. It provides managers with a precise picture of project health, no matter where the project is in the delivery process.
Moreover, using a PSA application will consolidate the siloed information that exists in stand-alone project management, time entry, scheduling, and budget tracking solutions. They also help to eliminate the series of loosely connected spreadsheets many professional services firms operate on. This delivers a single version of the truth and does a much better job of providing the right information, to the right people, at the right time.
“We are not billing the client for this, so we should put it on an internal admin project”
Another mistake when calculating professional services profitability is to treat non-billable time differently than you would billable time. If the work is related to a client or project, then it should have an influence on profitability. Building out estimates, compiling proposals, and negotiating contracts all take time and should be factored into project profitability.
If you don’t, you profit margins will be overstated and you may not be pricing your jobs at a rate that will truly earn your target margin.
Recommendation: Rethink Billable Utilization
Track sales time and other non-billable effort the same way you would any other project-based time. However, this time should be segmented appropriately so that a long sales cycle doesn’t make the project manager look like they delivered a less profitable project.
The way you organize your work is crucial when it comes to tracking non-billable time. Successful firms will often deploy two strategies to account for this time. The first is a multi-project approach. Pre-sales efforts go against their own project, and then, if the business is won, a second project manages the delivery effort. These two projects would both roll up to the same contract, engagement, and client. This allows for profitability analysis at different levels, and also helps managers understand the impact of pre-sales effort for the project and a client as a whole.
The second approach focuses on capturing labor cost for things like defective work, relationship management, and general goodwill. Successfully capturing this time requires the ability to track it within a project’s task structure. This time tracking strategy will enable team members to associate non-chargeable time with the appropriate task, providing further visibility into where problems occur.
“Labor cost is too sensitive or complex to track in our project delivery system”
At the core of all of these common struggles that professional services firms have when it comes to measuring and improving profitability is the assumption that the firms are, in some way, tracking their labor investment on each project. This is not the truth for all organizations. Many professional services firms, especially those who have not adopted a robust project delivery platform, shy away from loading labor costs into their project tracking. This is either because the tools they use do not have the capacity to track that information, or they are worried that the information will fall into the wrong hands.
These are valid concerns, but the visibility into mid-project profitability also carries tremendous value. This method for improving project profitability enables service leaders tounderstand project health through a fourth dimension that is often overlooked by traditional project management methods—value of the project to the organization. Traditional project management methods balance budget, schedule, and quality as the indicators project success. Yes, these are crucial, and focusing on only one often comes at the detriment of the others, but ask any professional services executive what makes a successful project and they’ll probably tell you “a happy client and a healthy profit.”
Recommendation: Create Project Staffing Models that Drive Profitability
Leverage a robust project delivery platform, such as a PSA solution, to model labor rates and control access to sensitive information. The first step to this process is determining who in your organization should have access to this information, and the answer to that will be different for every firm. Some organizations will allow project managers visibility into margins directly, and others will reserve that information for delivery or program managers.
Regardless of your firm’s approach, a robust PSA tool will help with this effort. Most solutions on the market have tight permissions surrounding labor cost information. Some will go even further by allowing labor rates to be entered as a range for a specific type of employee and separating visibility into actual cost and margin percent into different permission structures.
These two approaches allow organizations to communicate general cost and profitability without identifying any one person’s specific salary or hourly pay. While this won’t provide exact profitability information, it will paint a picture that is close enough for managing a successful project.
Eliminating the Barriers to Measuring Professional Services Profitability
Measuring profitability in a professional services firm can be difficult, and the myths discussed in this article represent only five of the most common objections that firms face when trying to establish frameworks for profitability measurement. Regardless of how successful or sophisticated your professional services firm may be, one fact remains—real-time visibility into profitability drives stronger margins.
If any of the excuses outlined in this post sound familiar, it may be time to take an in-depth look at how your firm organizes their work, the systems and tools that support their delivery process, and the flow of information necessary to deliver successful projects.